Questions? Feedback? powered by Olark live chat software

From the Expert Network | Best Practice #2: Set the Relationship Expectations and Boundaries, Refresh and Reinforce as needed

Five powerhouse experts and one high-achieving team from the Expert Network took time to speak with us about their “secret sauce” for a smooth project process, outcomes that everyone is excited about, and lessons they’ve learned when engagements with clients have not panned out that way. From these conversations, three overarching “best practices” themes emerged from their collective wisdom: Do the Work on the Front End, Set the Relationship Terms and Expectations, and Tending to the Dynamics of the Partnership. We divided them into three blog posts, to be released monthly in August 2019, September 2019, and October 2019.

Before dipping into their advice, learn about the contributing Experts by clicking any of the names below:

At every stage of the project, it’s important to communicate your preferred partnership structure and non-negotiables as a consultant, to listen back about how your partner views the engagement, and to have check-ins that help you stay aligned. Establishing clear boundaries and expectations is essential to stimulating a high quality experience, for both consultant and client. The following tips help you to facilitate these practices throughout the lifespan of the project. 

Establish your role as a consultant

Individuals and teams have varying philosophies on the types of partnership they set up with clients. To set and maintain a high functioning partnership, it is essential to clarify yours and communicate your expectations outright; it is crucial to ensuring a consulting relationship where your expectations and boundaries are respected. For example, Elana Feinberg makes sure that her clients understand the difference between her, as a consultant, and a temporary employee. To do this, she outlines her consistent weekly availability, as well as the amount of hours per week she has to dedicate to the project. Rex Varner’s preferred view on his engagement with clients is that “it’s not an equal relationship.” He sets up projects so that he is the one expected to deliver progress at each meeting, and so he is rarely reliant on the partner for anything that would hinder the work moving forward. However, in order to demand such high-order control, Rex clearly articulates the expectations of his work and the affiliated deliverables. He notes, 

“I am extremely well organized, share deliverables with [clients] often and early, and take full responsibility for driving the project.”

However, identifying the relational workflow structures is often dependent on the context of the project. Different organizations have different expectations, and it is essential to identify those early on in the consulting relationship. Elana relayed a cautionary tale of a consulting engagement early on in her career that she took on via a friend’s referral. She felt confident given her prior experience on similar projects; however, this organizational partner had never worked with a consultant before. They dove in without a scoping conversation, failed to set project expectations, and did not sign a contract together. Struggling to articulate what they needed, and impressing unwieldy expectations on her, the partner became impossible to deal with - but there were no documents to realign the conversation. In the end, Elana left the engagement with partial payment and a whole lot of frustration. However, Elana learned a critical lesson through this difficult situation, for each consulting project moving forward, she integrated discrete organizational steps, including the following:

  • a scoping conversation

  • clear expectations of project deliverables and time allotment

  • solid contract in place, which includes clear direction on what to do if the work extends beyond the boundaries discussed.

While each of these documents may be amended as the work evolves, having them in place allows for both the consultant and the client to have a common language and set of expectations. With these details in place, they are able to focus on the work.

Set your expectations of the partner

Before you get started on work, set some ground rules regarding operations and workflow. This tends to your own work style, your preferred apps and technology to facilitate workflow, and guidelines for collaboration.  These may include such topics as::

  • Your availability (hourly and weekly)

  • How each of you would like to be communicated with regularly or in an emergency (platform, format, frequency)

  • Preferred response time to communications

  • How often work should be reviewed and feedback given, and over what medium

  • What constitutes reasonable and unreasonable changes to the scope of work

The actual topics include should be set by the needs of the project and the circumstances of each party. It is helpful to formalize these expectations in a document, which can function as your personal “user guide,” which can be referred back to as a reminder. Creating an expectations document that reiterates these points and referring back to it at each meeting can be helpful reminders for everyone.

In addition to formalizing the operational expectations, our experts noted that they are sure to include a flexibility clause. This work is often dynamic and, Elana notes, “things are going to change.” However, creating a clear set of operational expectations creates an opportunity for revision and review, as made necessary by the dynamic nature of the work. Elana formalizes this flexibility into her contracts: The budget is always a price range, and the number of work hours is understood to be an estimate. The timelines that she develops take into account that the process may take longer than anticipated, including extra time for setbacks and revisions. However, even with this cushion, Elana advises that consultants must clearly communicate with their clients as they approach the thresholds of both hours and budgets as they relate to deliverables. With open conversations, both parties can discuss how to proceed and avoid any potential disagreements. 

Invest in face-to-face time

Each of our experts conducts a significant proportion of their work remotely; however, each acknowledged the importance of connecting with their clients face-to-face whenever possible. If possible, travel at the start of the engagement to meet your client and their team - you’ll also see how the team functions in real time, and how they react to your working style and suggestions. Plus, building rapport is easier and faster when you can look someone in the eye. 

Dr. Maya Bugg suggests that as early on as your proposed project plan, you can determine what can be accomplished online and what needs to be tackled offline. In her work as a DEI consultant, facilitating HR DEI sessions, going on tours of schools she’s working with, and going to a convening that several of the project stakeholders are attending are examples of prime opportunities for getting work done in person. For strategy projects, Rex Varner will often kick-start the project with a half day in-person meeting for white-boarding, and then plan in a few intense 3-4 hour in-person sessions throughout the project timeline. Monica and Michelle told us that “in an ideal world, we kick off the project face-to-face to determine the mission, vision, and theory of change”, and to establish the trust for later phases. This trust makes it easier to start tough conversations or to say something challenging, because they can anticipate how it will land with the client. These in-person, collaborative sessions lay an essential foundation that enables the work as it unfolds; then when communications may mostly take place remotely, you’ll have a better sense of how to communicate best.

Reinforce your lines when they matter

Client satisfaction and consultant flexibility are important, but so are knowing and holding your boundaries as complications arise. Partners can often make requests of you that are rushed, or outside of the scope of work, because they feel pressed to meet a goal, treat an emergency, or genuinely don’t realize that their ask is out of range. 

The EduDream team told us, “Client can get overzealous about timelines…there are instances where people want something above and beyond the scope… [We] find that we have to make sure we aren’t overextending ourselves on what we promised.”

Assume the best of intentions, but protect your time and boundaries. For example, you might draw a hard line at a request compromising the quality of the deliverable you provide, and in turn undermining the desired outcome. 


Thanks for reading! Check back next month for “Tending to the Dynamics of the Partnership”, and let us know what boundaries you like to define with clients, and how you’ve dealt with any boundary breaches.

Supporting Organizational Capacity for DEI: Lessons From the DEI Expert Hub

Supporting Organizational Capacity for DEI: Lessons From the DEI Expert Hub

Earlier this year, we launched the DEI Expert Hub, so these leaders could connect with experienced DEI coaches, consultants, and technical assistance providers. Six months in, we’ve provided hands-on guidance to over 30 schools, nonprofits, and foundations as they’ve navigated the process of articulating their DEI needs, scoping their projects, and identifying expert supports. Hundreds more have used the website to explore project options. Over the course of our expert intake process, we’ve also got to know over 70 DEI coaches, consultants, and technical assistance providers. Through each of these conversations and interactions we’re gaining insight into the drivers and barriers for organizations and experts taking on this work. We share a few of these lessons here.

Calling all education experts! Catalyst:Ed's summer selection cycle open on May 29

Calling all education experts! Catalyst:Ed's summer selection cycle open on May 29

We are excited to announce that the Catalyst:Ed Summer selection cycle opened yesterday. 

Catalyst:Ed was founded on the premise that we can catalyze impact and improve outcomes for all young people by leveraging the best education expertise to solve the most pressing challenges. A year and a half later, we have had the privilege of getting to know over 400 outstanding education leaders who bring deep expertise vital to the effectiveness and dynamism of our education ecosystem. We’ve watched in awe as they’ve rolled up their sleeves and helped schools, schools systems, nonprofits and grantmakers complete critical projects and address major challenges. And we’ve deepened our resolve to identify the best and most diverse talent in education and amplify their impact so we can together help our educators, families and kids.

The Catalyst:Ed Expert Code of Conduct

The Catalyst:Ed Expert Code of Conduct

The Catalyst:Ed Expert Code of Conduct applies to the experts in our network. It is derived from our mission and values, and informed by our collective experiences as education leaders. It can be summed up as: “Act with integrity, treat each other with respect, and work in the best interest of kids”.

The CE Expert Code of Conduct articulates the high expectations we have from CE Experts as it relates to their work and interactions with clients. In exchange, we promise to do our utmost to provide our Experts with the support they need to meet to these expectations.

Effective capacity building: A brief guide for intermediary organizations

Effective capacity building: A brief guide for intermediary organizations

Intermediary organizations play a critical role in the afterschool ecosystem by connecting OST providers to each other and to other stakeholders - including policymakers, funders, parents and communities. In this post, we share (1) three guiding principles, (2) five ideas for projects and (3) a few key considerations to expand provider capacity.

How can we support you this year?

How can we support you this year?

Happy 2017! I hope the year is off to a great start for you.

At Catalyst:Ed, we've had an introspective start to the year. I'm incredibly proud of what we achieved as a team in 2016, our first full year of operations. We helped almost a hundred K-12 education organizations address some of their most critical challenges and grew our network to more than 400 outstanding experts, each of whom brings deep know-how in an area vital to education

Selecting the right consultant: Evaluating proposals

Selecting the right consultant: Evaluating proposals

Occasionally, clients will reach out to us with an ask. Through our platform, they have sourced proposals from several similarly well-qualified consultants, and they are having a hard time deciding between the options. Do we have any guidance for them on selecting the right consultant?

Announcing the launch of the Afterschool Expert Hub

Announcing the launch of the Afterschool Expert Hub

We have exciting news to share with you. Catalyst:Ed has partnered with the National Afterschool Association (NAA) to develop the Afterschool Expert Hub. Nested within the larger Catalyst:Ed network, this unique service will specifically focus on meeting the needs of the 10,000+ afterschool and expanded learning program providers and partners around the country by helping them connect with experts for projects and professional development.

[Ask Catalyst:Ed] Fixed price or hourly? Structuring your project contract

[Ask Catalyst:Ed] Fixed price or hourly? Structuring your project contract

Here are two things that happened earlier this week:

From an email:
Expert: "Hey, the project scope says the project will have a deliverables-based contract. Can you explain what that means?"

From a scoping conversation with a client:
Catalyst:Ed: "Do you have any thoughts on whether this should be a fixed price contract or an hourly contract?"
Client: (silence)

How to write a compelling proposal

How to write a compelling proposal

If you ask consultants about the least favorite part of their jobs, proposal writing usually ranks in the top three. Drafting a proposal can be an unpleasant task for many reasons: it can seem impersonal and one-sided, you often don't have as much information about the project as you'd like and pitching yourself in writing can feel uncomfortable.

But there are consultants who have learned to love the task. The act of writing a proposal forces them to slow down and pay attention: to internalize the needs of the project and determine whether they are the right fit.

How to not work with a "lemon"

How to not work with a "lemon"

Finding the right expert in a world of incomplete information

A few months ago, we were in the market to buy a house. A newly constructed home in our preferred neighborhood was beyond our budget, so we focused on the older houses. Built about a century ago, these came loaded with charm. Unfortunately, as our realtor often reminded us, they could also come loaded with issues. More than outdated layouts and rusty fixtures, we needed to be concerned about potential disasters hiding behind walls, under floors and above ceilings – think flood damage, old plumbing and wiring, termites, mold. As potential buyers, our real concern was not what we knew, but what we didn’t know.

The case for short-term talent in education

The case for short-term talent in education

Like all great conversations, this one left me with plenty to think about. A good friend and I had just spent an hour brainstorming ideas for building authorizer capacity. As we looked at our list, however, we realized that we had a problem. Much of the work needed expert short-term talent, and identifying, recruiting, vetting and matching talent to the work was a daunting task. Wasn’t it ironic, we mused, that education had a large, growing pool of experienced and expert professionals – yet schools and nonprofits that need expertise for short-term, mission-critical work find it difficult to access the right talent quickly, reliably and affordably? Wouldn’t it be great if there were a network of “catalysts” that organizations could call upon when the right opportunities for leveraging their expertise emerged?